Why Signal is not the perfect messenger

·

Signal is not the perfect?

In today’s digital age, messaging apps have become an integral part of our lives. Among the popular messaging apps, Signal has gained immense popularity due to its focus on security and privacy. While Signal has been lauded for its security features, it’s not a perfect messenger. In this article, we’ll explore why Signal is not perfect and the challenges it faces.

Decentralization challenges

One of the significant challenges Signal faces is its decentralization aspect. The app’s reliance on phone numbers for user identification means that Signal cannot be entirely decentralized. While Signal uses end-to-end encryption to protect the content of messages, the metadata (e.g., who’s messaging whom) is still visible to the company. Signal has been working to address this issue by developing a new feature called “sealed sender” that will prevent the app from seeing metadata, but this feature is still in the testing phase.

Signal has also faced challenges with its user registration process. In January 2021, Signal experienced a surge in user registrations after WhatsApp updated its privacy policy. The sudden influx of users overwhelmed Signal’s servers, causing delays and outages. While Signal has since increased its server capacity to address this issue, it highlights the challenges of managing a messaging app with a growing user base.

Centralization Challenges

Moreover, the centralized infrastructure is bad for Signal’s security and privacy features. Centralization means that Signal’s servers hold all the data, making it a prime target for hackers. A centralized system also allows for government surveillance and censorship, as demonstrated by the recent shutdown of WhatsApp in China. Decentralization, on the other hand, distributes data across multiple servers, making it much harder for a single entity to access or control it.

Signal’s Latest Updates

Signal’s latest updates have also caused some inconvenience to users. The app’s recent update requires users to have a PIN to access their account, which can be a hassle for users who prefer not to use PINs or passwords. Additionally, Signal’s new group calling feature requires users to have a stable internet connection and a compatible device, which can be challenging for users with older devices or slower internet connections.

Another update that caused some controversy was Signal’s introduction of cryptocurrency payments through MobileCoin. While the move was seen as a step towards greater privacy, some users criticized the decision, citing concerns about the association with a specific cryptocurrency and the potential for privacy issues related to financial transactions.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while Signal is a great messaging app that prioritizes security and privacy, it’s not perfect. The app faces challenges related to its decentralization, centralized infrastructure, and server management. While Signal is actively working to address these issues, users should be aware of the limitations of the app and take steps to protect their privacy online. It’s always important to weigh the benefits and drawbacks of any messaging app and decide which one works best for your specific needs.